OPNFV Apex Release Notes¶
Contents:
1. OPNFV Release Notes for the Colorado release of OPNFV Apex deployment tool¶
Table of Contents
- OPNFV Release Notes for the Colorado release of OPNFV Apex deployment tool
- Abstract
- License
- Version History
- Important Notes
- Summary
- Release Data
- Known Limitations, Issues and Workarounds
- Scenario specific release notes
- Scenario os-odl_l3-nofeature known issues
- Scenario os-odl_l2-nofeature known issues
- Scenario os-odl-bgpvpn known issues
- Scenario os-onos-nofeatures/os-onos-sfc known issues
- Scenario os-odl_l2-sfc-noha known issues
- Scenario os-nosdn-ovs known issues
- Scenario os-odl_l2-fdio-noha known issues
- Scenario os-nosdn-fdio-noha known issues
- General HA scenario known issues
- Test Result
- References
1.1. Abstract¶
This document provides the release notes for Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain.
1.2. License¶
All Apex and “common” entities are protected by the Apache License ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/ )
1.3. Version History¶
Date | Ver. | Authors | Comment |
2016-09-20 | 2.1.0 | Tim Rozet | More updates for Colorado |
2016-08-11 | 2.0.0 | Dan Radez | Updates for Colorado |
2015-09-17 | 1.0.0 | Dan Radez | Rewritten for RDO Manager update |
1.4. Important Notes¶
This is the OPNFV Colorado release that implements the deploy stage of the OPNFV CI pipeline via Apex.
Apex is based on RDO’s Triple-O installation tool chain. More information at http://rdoproject.org
Carefully follow the installation-instructions which guide a user on how to deploy OPNFV using Apex installer.
1.5. Summary¶
Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain will establish an OPNFV target system on a Pharos compliant lab infrastructure. The current definition of an OPNFV target system is OpenStack Mitaka combined with an SDN controller, such as OpenDaylight. The system is deployed with OpenStack High Availability (HA) for most OpenStack services. SDN controllers are deployed only on the first controller (see HAIssues for known HA SDN issues). Ceph storage is used as Cinder backend, and is the only supported storage for Colorado. Ceph is setup as 3 OSDs and 3 Monitors, one OSD+Mon per Controller node in an HA setup. Apex also supports non-HA deployments, which deploys a single controller and n number of compute nodes. Furthermore, Apex is capable of deploying scenarios in a bare metal or virtual fashion. Virtual deployments use multiple VMs on the jump host and internal networking to simulate the a bare metal deployment.
- Documentation is built by Jenkins
- .iso image is built by Jenkins
- .rpm packages are built by Jenkins
- Jenkins deploys a Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain bare metal, which includes 3 control+network nodes, and 2 compute nodes.
1.6. Release Data¶
Project | apex |
Repo/tag | apex/colorado.1.0 |
Release designation | colorado.1.0 |
Release date | 2016-09-22 |
Purpose of the delivery | OPNFV Colorado release |
1.6.1. Version change¶
1.6.1.1. Module version changes¶
This is the first tracked version of the Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain. It is based on following upstream versions:
- OpenStack (Mitaka release)
- OpenDaylight (Beryllium/Boron releases)
- CentOS 7
1.6.1.2. Document Version Changes¶
This is the first tracked version of Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain. The following documentation is provided with this release:
- OPNFV Installation instructions for the Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain - ver. 1.0.0
- OPNFV Release Notes for the Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain - ver. 1.0.0 (this document)
1.6.1.3. Feature Additions¶
JIRA REFERENCE | SLOGAN |
JIRA: APEX-107 | OpenDaylight HA - OVSDB Clustering |
JIRA: APEX-108 | Migrate to OpenStack Mitaka |
JIRA: APEX-30 | Support VLAN tagged deployments |
JIRA: APEX-105 | Enable Huge Page Configuration Options |
JIRA: APEX-111 | Allow RAM to be specified for Control/Compute in Virtual Deployments |
JIRA: APEX-119 | Enable OVS DPDK as a deployment Scenario in Apex |
JIRA: APEX-126 | Tacker Service deployed by Apex |
JIRA: APEX-135 | Congress Service deployed by Apex |
JIRA: APEX-127 | Nova Instance CPU Pinning |
JIRA: APEX-130 | IPv6 Underlay Deployment |
JIRA: APEX-133 | FDIO with Honeycomb Agent |
JIRA: APEX-141 | Integrate VSPERF into Apex |
JIRA: APEX-172 | Enable ONOS SFC |
1.6.1.4. Bug Corrections¶
JIRA TICKETS:
JIRA REFERENCE | SLOGAN |
JIRA: APEX-86 | Need ability to specify number of compute nodes |
JIRA: APEX-180 | Baremetal deployment error: Failed to mount root partition /dev/sda on /mnt/rootfs |
JIRA: APEX-161 | Heat autoscaling stack creation fails for non-admin users |
JIRA: APEX-198 | Missing NAT iptables rule for public network in instack VM |
JIRA: APEX-147 | Installer doesn’t generate/distribute SSH keys between compute nodes |
JIRA: APEX-109 | ONOS routes local subnet traffic to GW |
JIRA: APEX-146 | Swift service present in available endpoints |
JIRA: APEX-160 | Enable force_metadata to support subnets with VM as the router |
JIRA: APEX-114 | OpenDaylight GUI is not available |
JIRA: APEX-100 | DNS1 and DNS2 should be handled in nic bridging |
JIRA: APEX-100 | DNS1 and DNS2 should be handled in nic bridging |
JIRA: APEX-155 | NIC Metric value not used when bridging NICs |
JIRA: APEX-136 | 2 network deployment fails |
JIRA: APEX-89 | Deploy Ceph OSDs on compute nodes |
JIRA: APEX-137 | added arping ass dependency for ONOS deployments |
JIRA: APEX-121 | VM Storage deletion intermittently fails |
JIRA: APEX-182 | Nova services not correctly deployed |
JIRA: APEX-153 | brbm bridge not created in jumphost |
1.6.2. Deliverables¶
1.6.2.1. Software Deliverables¶
- Apex .iso file
- Apex release .rpm (opnfv-apex-release)
- Apex overcloud .rpm (opnfv-apex) - For nosdn and OpenDaylight Scenarios
- Apex overcloud onos .rpm (opnfv-apex-onos) - ONOS Scenarios
- Apex undercloud .rpm (opnfv-apex-undercloud)
- Apex common .rpm (opnfv-apex-common)
- build.sh - Builds the above artifacts
- opnfv-deploy - Automatically deploys Target OPNFV System
- opnfv-clean - Automatically resets a Target OPNFV Deployment
- opnfv-util - Utility to connect to or debug Overcloud nodes + OpenDaylight
1.6.2.2. Documentation Deliverables¶
- OPNFV Installation instructions for the Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain - ver. 1.0.0
- OPNFV Release Notes for the Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain - ver. 1.0.0 (this document)
1.7. Known Limitations, Issues and Workarounds¶
1.7.1. System Limitations¶
Max number of blades: 1 Apex undercloud, 3 Controllers, 20 Compute blades
Min number of blades: 1 Apex undercloud, 1 Controller, 1 Compute blade
Storage: Ceph is the only supported storage configuration.
Min master requirements: At least 16GB of RAM for baremetal jumphost, 24GB for virtual deployments (noHA).
1.7.2. Known Issues¶
JIRA TICKETS:
JIRA REFERENCE | SLOGAN |
JIRA: APEX-203 | Swift proxy enabled and fails in noha deployments |
JIRA: APEX-215 | Keystone services not configured and the error is silently ignored (VLAN Deployments) |
JIRA: APEX-208 | Need ability to specify which NIC to place VLAN on |
JIRA: APEX-254 | Add dynamic hugepages configuration |
JIRA: APEX-138 | Unclear error message when interface set to dhcp |
JIRA: APEX-389 (Danube) | Compute kernel parameters are used for all nodes |
1.7.3. Workarounds¶
-
1.8. Scenario specific release notes¶
1.8.2. Scenario os-odl_l2-nofeature known issues¶
- APEX-149:
- Openflow rules are populated very slowly
1.8.3. Scenario os-odl-bgpvpn known issues¶
- APEX-278:
- Duplicate neutron config class declaration for SDNVPN
1.8.4. Scenario os-onos-nofeatures/os-onos-sfc known issues¶
- APEX-281:
- ONOS sometimes fails to provide addresses to instances
1.8.6. Scenario os-nosdn-ovs known issues¶
- APEX-274:
- OVS DPDK scenario does not create vhost user ports
1.8.7. Scenario os-odl_l2-fdio-noha known issues¶
- FDS-16:
- Security group configuration through nova leads to vhostuser port connection issues
- FDS-62:
- APEX - Increase number of files MariaDB can open
- FDS-79:
- Sometimes (especially in bulk crete/delete operations when multiple networks/ports are created within short time) OpenDaylight doesn’t accept creation requests
- FDS-80:
- After launching a VM it stayed forever in BUILD status. Also further operation related to this VM (volume attachment etc.) caused problems
- FDS-81:
- After functest finishes there are two bds on computes and none on controller
- FDS-82:
- Nova list shows no vms but there are some on computes in paused state
- APEX-217:
- qemu not configured with correct group:user
1.8.8. Scenario os-nosdn-fdio-noha known issues¶
Note that a set of manual configration steps need to be performed post an automated deployment for the scenario to be fully functional. Please refer to FDS-159 and FDS-160 for details.
- FDS-155:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: tempest_smoke_serial causes mariadb/mysqld process to hang
- FDS-156:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: Race conditions for network-vif-plugged notification
- FDS-157:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: Intermittently VMs would get assigned 2 IPs instead of 1
- FDS-158:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: VM start/launch fails with “no more IP addresses” in neutron logs
- FDS-159:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: Security groups not yet supported
- FDS-160:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: Vlan fix on controller
- FDS-161:
- os-nosdn-fdio-noha scenario: VPP fails with certain UCS B-series blades
1.9. Test Result¶
The Colorado release with the Apex deployment toolchain has undergone QA test runs with the following results:
TEST-SUITE | Results: |
- | - |
1.10. References¶
For more information on the OPNFV Colorado release, please see:
http://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/Colorado
Authors: | Tim Rozet (trozet@redhat.com) |
---|---|
Authors: | Dan Radez (dradez@redhat.com) |
Version: | 2.1.0 |